Scientists discover new way to make fuel from water and sunlight, but more work is needed

zohaibahd

Posts: 657   +16
Staff
The big picture: Most hydrogen production still relies on natural gas. However, a new technique that uses only sunlight and water could allow humanity to move away from using fossil fuels to produce cleaner energy.

Researchers at Shinshu University in Japan have built a novel reactor to manufacture renewable hydrogen fuel directly from sunlight and water. It's still an early prototype, but the system could eventually provide a way to produce zero-emission fuel cheaply and sustainably.

The reactor is 1,076 sq ft and employs unique photocatalytic panels to split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. This conversion leverages a two-step process. First, the reactor extracts oxygen. The second step separates the hydrogen atoms. The device can then siphon off the hydrogen and store it as a clean-burning fuel for powering vehicles, generators, or other machines.

This method differs from today's "one-step" catalysts that split water into hydrogen and oxygen in one go. Although the traditional method is easier, it is also terribly inefficient because the hydrogen fuel requires refinement using natural gas.

The team initially tested the reactor with UV light, which showed promise. Under actual sunlight, it yielded even better results, with around 50 percent higher solar energy conversion.

The system sounds quite promising. However, there's a catch. The reactor only converts about one percent of sunlight into hydrogen fuel under standard simulated conditions. That's an improvement over previous attempts, but it's still too low for wide-scale adoption. The researchers note that an approximately five percent efficiency is needed to make it commercially viable.

The scientists believe that increasing the reactor scale and developing new, higher-performing photocatalysts is critical. However, achieving viable efficiency will require a broader scientific effort focused on enhancing the photocatalysts.

"The most important aspect to develop is the efficiency of solar-to-chemical energy conversion by photocatalysts," senior author Kazunari Domen said.

"If it is improved to a practical level, many researchers will work seriously on the development of mass production technology and gas separation processes, as well as large-scale plant construction. This will also change the way many people, including policymakers, think about solar energy conversion, and accelerate the development of infrastructure, laws, and regulations related to solar fuels."

Despite the remaining technical hurdles, the concept shows great promise. If scientists can refine the catalysts and scale up the reactors, we could be getting our fuel fix from two of the most plentiful resources on Earth rather than finite fossil fuels.

Masthead credit: Philip Graves

Permalink to story:

 
It takes a large amount of energy to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen.
Burning anything in our 75%+ Nitrogen atmosphere is inevitably going to lead to more CO2 and more NOX.
Realistically, the Sun will be there for another 4.6 Billion years sending energy to Earth. Solar power makes the most sense - in not only generating power that could be used to help create Hydrogen gas, but in powering an electrified future.

Problem is: cheaper energy means larger population growth.

I for one don't think Earth needs more people.
 
It takes a large amount of energy to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen.
Burning anything in our 75%+ Nitrogen atmosphere is inevitably going to lead to more CO2 and more NOX.
Realistically, the Sun will be there for another 4.6 Billion years sending energy to Earth. Solar power makes the most sense - in not only generating power that could be used to help create Hydrogen gas, but in powering an electrified future.

Problem is: cheaper energy means larger population growth.

I for one don't think Earth needs more people.
it makes zero sense to burn hydrogen but using it with a more eifficiant fuel cell EV will be part of of the clean fuel future especially for larger vehicles that do long distances where batteries are less viable.
 
It takes a large amount of energy to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen.
Burning anything in our 75%+ Nitrogen atmosphere is inevitably going to lead to more CO2 and more NOX.
Realistically, the Sun will be there for another 4.6 Billion years sending energy to Earth. Solar power makes the most sense - in not only generating power that could be used to help create Hydrogen gas, but in powering an electrified future.

Problem is: cheaper energy means larger population growth.

I for one don't think Earth needs more people.
Considering an estimated 10% of the earth is actually populated, perhaps if the nations stopped wasting money and resources on wars, gender studies, and blasting rockets into space, and more into sustainability and building communities for all of humanity. I would compromise with your comments and agree that the world doesn't need more useless, lazy, lying, cheating, stealing, greedy, hypocritical people. Solar power is a great thing! Sadly the price markup is outstanding, and the power companies still have their hands deep into the cookie jar(in many common scenarios). It's only affordable to a niche group of people on this planet sadly.
 
These techs have their place, for probably specialised uses

Ignoring the eco cost of covering land, Then if you can make system that reflects little energy back into clouds etc , converts to hydrogen , and somehow uses the heat for another purpose then could help fight climate change

I think most of us are aware 2H +O equals water and not CO2

I do prefer modifying existing bacteria to feed on organic waste to make such gases

Photosynthesis is also being study and done in labs I believe
 
It takes a large amount of energy to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen.
Burning anything in our 75%+ Nitrogen atmosphere is inevitably going to lead to more CO2 and more NOX.
Realistically, the Sun will be there for another 4.6 Billion years sending energy to Earth. Solar power makes the most sense - in not only generating power that could be used to help create Hydrogen gas, but in powering an electrified future.

Problem is: cheaper energy means larger population growth.

I for one don't think Earth needs more people.
There are going to be times solar simply isn't viable. Why people refuse to accept this is beyond me.
Considering an estimated 10% of the earth is actually populated, perhaps if the nations stopped wasting money and resources on wars, gender studies, and blasting rockets into space, and more into sustainability and building communities for all of humanity. I would compromise with your comments and agree that the world doesn't need more useless, lazy, lying, cheating, stealing, greedy, hypocritical people. Solar power is a great thing! Sadly the price markup is outstanding, and the power companies still have their hands deep into the cookie jar(in many common scenarios). It's only affordable to a niche group of people on this planet sadly.
The other 90 percent is either being used up to support the 10 percent, or is reserved for natural preserves, or is mostly uninhabitable. We cannot sustain what we have now, energy use is merely one component of production. Open pits for mineral production won't magically disappear because you own a solar panel. Aquifers won't refill because you recycle, ece.

People really seem to think you can pave the whole world into NYC and that it would be in any way sustainable or desirable.
 
Considering an estimated 10% of the earth is actually populated, perhaps if the nations stopped wasting money and resources on wars, gender studies, and blasting rockets into space, and more into sustainability and building communities for all of humanity. I would compromise with your comments and agree that the world doesn't need more useless, lazy, lying, cheating, stealing, greedy, hypocritical people. Solar power is a great thing! Sadly the price markup is outstanding, and the power companies still have their hands deep into the cookie jar(in many common scenarios). It's only affordable to a niche group of people on this planet sadly.
There is more to the earth than land for humans we have taken enough of the land.
 
Considering an estimated 10% of the earth is actually populated, perhaps if the nations stopped wasting money and resources on wars, gender studies, and blasting rockets into space, and more into sustainability and building communities for all of humanity. I would compromise with your comments and agree that the world doesn't need more useless, lazy, lying, cheating, stealing, greedy, hypocritical people. Solar power is a great thing! Sadly the price markup is outstanding, and the power companies still have their hands deep into the cookie jar(in many common scenarios). It's only affordable to a niche group of people on this planet sadly.
I'd rather see ariable land used for farming than building suburbs. That's just me.
 
It could happen and maybe it will but in the far flung future. I hope DOGE takes a look at this project if it gov funded
 
We could make a sea of fuel, and then finally we can have automobile heaven on earth
V8! SHINY AND CHROME!

We could also use it to effectively reverse industrialization, by making fuel oil and pumping it back underground where it came from, or solidifying it into a stable form and bury it in salt mines, removing that CO2 from the atmosphere. Hell we could use it to create natural gas for heating homes.
 
Question is how long will it take for wide spread adoption, will there still be funding, will someone buy it out if funding diminishes? As time goes on we tend to forget things.
 
Back